[BNM] [OT] Brighton's nuclear power station?

[paul perrin]

No, its a zero sum game from that point of view - the same number of kids
will go to duff schools and to good schools - the change just means it will
be different kids going to each.

I was referring to the greater good of everyone who thinks wasting energy is
daft.

Paul /)/+)


On 24/05/07, Tom Dussek (Hotmail) <tomdussek at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > As the (supposed) greens voted in favour of school catchment areas that
> > would reduce the possibilities for children to walk to school (and so
> have
> > to be driven) I think it is safe to assume that (like pretty much all
> > politicians) they will do whatever suits their individual personal
> interest
> > rather than any greater good.
>
> Whose "greater good" is that then, Paul? Do you mean the families who
> live near the (very few) secondary schools in Brighton, all of which are
> inland? Don't kids that live near the sea count as being part of the
> "greater good"?
>
> Tom Dussek
> (Near the sea with 2 kids and very happy with the new rules. But then I
> would be, wouldn't I)
> --
>
>
> BNM Social - http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/190648
>
> BNM Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wessexnetworks.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/bnmlist/
> BNM info/archives:
> http://www.brightonnewmedia.org/
>
> BNM archive search:
> http://www.roddis.org/bnm/search.php
>
> BNM powered by Wessex Networks:
> http://www.wessexnetworks.com
>